338 Comments
User's avatar
Lina Reinert's avatar

I’m praying California and many other states follow suit!!!!!

Expand full comment
Diane's avatar

Sitting here in Maine with no power for 31 hrs and counting and this news is GIVING ME LIFE!

Expand full comment
ANTIFA Libbey Dem's avatar

Stay safe! ❤️

Expand full comment
Donna Walsh's avatar

I’m in Cumberland cnty. Got ours back at 5pm. Good luck to you wherever you are.

Expand full comment
Diane's avatar

Thanks, Donna. I'm in Orono. Power still out, and I just tested positive for covid. First time in four years! Still better off than many people in Maine right now.

Expand full comment
A R's avatar

Have cousins in the Ellsworth area. Keeping them and you in my thoughts and prayers (not that I have any pull.)

Expand full comment
Owlison's avatar

Prayer IS THE GREATEST PULL. You have it!

Expand full comment
Jeffrey R. Zettlemoyer's avatar

Diane,

I guess this news warmed the cockles of your heart.

I hope the power resumes shortly.

Expand full comment
Audrey Roth's avatar

If by some miracle SCOTUS does the right thing and rules that Trump can be kept off the ballot, are there enough states that are likely to keep him off that he won’t be able to get to 270 in the Electoral College?

Expand full comment
Lorraine Brennan's avatar

If SCOTUS determines he cannot run under the 14th Amendment it would apply to all States.

Expand full comment
C. Thomas's avatar

It's the 14th Amendment at play here. It says that "officials who take an oath to support the Constitution are banned from future office if they 'engaged in insurrection' ", and he obviously DID.

Expand full comment
Judi's avatar

one of the main reasons the Supremes will NOT allow CO to do this.

Expand full comment
Michael Stayton's avatar

Finger check: 14th Amendment? You can use Edit option at the "..."

Expand full comment
Lorraine Brennan's avatar

I did.

Expand full comment
James Robert Van Langen's avatar

Hope springs eternal!

Expand full comment
Rebecca  Booth's avatar

We 🙏 that other states follow suit!😂🇺🇸💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

Expand full comment
Judi's avatar

Imo, the Supreme Court will not uphold this Colorado Supreme Court decision. I do not let myself feel hopeful for actions I know in my head will not happen. I keep my heart out of the equations…..especially pertaining to Trump.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

One story about the Donald’s removal from Colorado’s ballot alluded to an appeal to the US Supreme Court . I am not a Constitutional scholar , but my recollection is that if a state’s ballot concerns are not mentioned SPECIFICALLY in the US Constitution then the US Supreme Court has no say in the matter . Am I correct?

Expand full comment
Fay Reid's avatar

Yes, John, you are correct. Amendment 10 Specifically states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. " It was by this Amendment the Supreme Court was Constitutionally able to overturn Roe v Wade. It is also why I think 'Citizens United' is Unconstitutional.

Expand full comment
Zach Weingart's avatar

THIS t***p- dominated SCOTUS will find a way around it. The Grotesque Gold-tone Grifter™ always finds a way to flout the law. But I hope you're correct.💙

Expand full comment
Fay Reid's avatar

Me too

Expand full comment
Judi's avatar

agree

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

Agree that USSC cannot rewrite CO election law. Besides It would offend the GOP insistence on state’s rights on matters like abortion. They are hoisted by their own petard. And I continue, ala Henny Penny, to scream that every state should bring this action and boot him off the ballot. Petitions circulating in NH now.

Expand full comment
Lorraine Brennan's avatar

The analysis is based on the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. It is most certainly an issue for SCOTUS.

Expand full comment
Zach Weingart's avatar

DAMN IT! If they take this issue away from the people 6 of them have no heart and no soul

Expand full comment
Fay Reid's avatar

The 24th Amendment refers to poll tax, the 10th Amendment is more accurate in this instance.

Expand full comment
Lorraine Brennan's avatar

You are correct. It’s the 14th Amendment Section 3, Typing in the dark is not in my skill set.

Expand full comment
Fay Reid's avatar

Understood!

Expand full comment
Sandy Sears's avatar

I sure hope so!

Expand full comment
Lynn Matsuoka's avatar

wow,hope so.

Expand full comment
Caroline Grevelle's avatar

Do you think the US Supreme Court will side with Colorado?

Thanks, Mary!

Expand full comment
Blue Dot/Red State's avatar

That's what I want to know too

Expand full comment
Hans Cox's avatar

Which justices, if any, need to recuse themselves and why?

Expand full comment
Audrey Roth's avatar

Need to or will?

Expand full comment
Claire Read, PhD's avatar

Mary, this will get sent to SCOTUS. What are the chances they’ll let this stand or throw it out? I’m in CO so deliriously happy-for the moment. Please ask this question. 😘🙏🏻

Expand full comment
C. Thomas's avatar

Congratulations! It must be awesome to live in a State you don't have to be ashamed of. I'm an elderly 5th Generation Texan and used to be proud of it, but we peaked under Ann Richards and right now I'd gladly emigrate to a more enlightened State if I had the means.

Expand full comment
Patricia Lynn's avatar

I’m in the red state just above you (Oklahoma), am 80 yrs and feel the same way! We do have a fairly large number of Dems in my area but we haven’t been able to vote out our Rep ..... yet!

Expand full comment
C. Thomas's avatar

Remember when we were young and full of hope and thought that people were generally getting smarter? I miss that feeling. I live in Austin, a place Ram Dass once described as 'an oasis'. (I describe it as an Oasis of BLUE in a state that's hopelessly dumb-ass Red.)

Expand full comment
Kristin Sewell's avatar

If the states are given responsibility for running the elections, what standing does SCOTUS have to reverse a state Supreme court's decision? Could SCOTUS decline to hear the case? I know they probably won't but isn't that actually the most prudent position for then to take?

Expand full comment
Lorraine Brennan's avatar

They have standing as the issue is an interpretation of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.

Expand full comment
Kristin Sewell's avatar

14th, but yeah, standing wasn't the right word... their ruling would be in conflict with the Election Clause, so that's what I'm interested in.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 20, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Kristin Sewell's avatar

The 24th Amendment is about poll taxes required to vote. It's Article 3 of the 14th Amendment.

Expand full comment
Lorraine Brennan's avatar

Yes, I was typing in the dark. The Supremacy clause is also a factor.

Expand full comment
Kristin Sewell's avatar

Just admit you made an error. Don't edit and then dirty delete.

Expand full comment
Lorraine Brennan's avatar

I admitted it and corrected it. But thanks for the nasty comment.

Expand full comment
Chroma Lynn's avatar

My question: What kind of tortured logic can make both things true? Trump on all ballots via SCOTUS but pregnant women as yet unprotected via medieval leaning states? My head might explode.

Expand full comment
Barbara Faigen's avatar

Robert Reich said if the Supreme Court agrees with the Colorado Supreme Court, then Trump cannot be on any state’s ballot. True?

Expand full comment
On the other hand's avatar

That's a big if.

Expand full comment
Judi's avatar

The main reason Supremes will not rule in favor of CO. We can’t have a mass upheaval of all 50 states.

Expand full comment
Therese's avatar

What’s the likelihood that SCOTUS makes a decision on the merits vs. taking an off ramp on procedural grounds or another basis?

Expand full comment
LI's avatar

POS Pussy Grabber (I refuse to use his real name) is a national security risk. PERIOD. How can the US Justice Department or any state justice department leverage Colorado's finding of fact to keep POS Pussy Grabber out of the Oval even if elected?

Thanks, Mary. Sorry your family is so toxic.

Expand full comment
Chroma Lynn's avatar

Truth. Mary is remarkably stable and based on my own survival of similar I’m sure it requires a lot of continuing inner work. Bless🙏🏼😊

Expand full comment
CAROL A LAMBERT's avatar

Are the idiot women voting for him hoping to get grabbed?

Expand full comment
richard molina's avatar

Christmas came EARLY FOR ME

🎊🎈🎉🛍️ \(^o^)/

Expand full comment
Linda Krause's avatar

Me too!🎄🎄

Expand full comment
Judy Handley's avatar

Discuss the "conviction" issue in regards to whether its necessary for upholding the 14th.

Expand full comment
DeeAnn Hopings's avatar

Can Trump be a Write-In Candidate? (Geez, I hope not!!)

Expand full comment
Audrey Roth's avatar

He could be, but it wouldn’t matter. The language says he can’t serve, not that he can’t run, if I recall correctly

Expand full comment
DeeAnn Hopings's avatar

OK, then my worry is that someone could try to use those votes as leverage.

Expand full comment
mataliandy's avatar

Write-ins pretty much never get enough votes to matter. Being off the ballot is the death-knell for a campaign.

Expand full comment
DeeAnn Hopings's avatar

True, but this is no ordinary election.

Expand full comment
A R's avatar

Also true but it would take a huge amount of voter education for a write-in candidate to get enough votes to move the needle.

Expand full comment
A R's avatar

They’ll also have to know how to spell his name. I think some of his supporters will have difficulty with this.

Expand full comment
Arc of a Diver's avatar

The ruling says the Sec of State cannot count write-in ballots for him because he cannot hold office.

Expand full comment
DeeAnn Hopings's avatar

Works For Me!

Expand full comment
Victoria's avatar

No. Secretary of State must not count write-in votes for him.

Expand full comment
Christine's avatar

This is the primary that he won’t be on.will he still appear on their ballot come November?

Expand full comment
Victoria's avatar

No, because he cannot be the nominee.

Expand full comment
Michelle Casey's avatar

What does he foresee in other states, SCOTUS, and 2024 if the ruling stands?

Expand full comment